Socialism is a system of slavery

Socialism is a system of slavery in which the slave is paid a salary from money acquired by taxing his income. Ideally, the salary paid and the income taxed perfectly offset one another, so the slave is never better off during any point of his life. Paradise never changes.

However, since salaried slave, as with chattel slaves, are normally provided with “room & board,” the ideal is missed by the subtracted essentials. Both forms are slavery allow, besides room & board, clothing expenses. For chattel slaves the clothing is typically “hand-me-downs” from the ”masters,” the cost of which emjoys an amortized function for the master, which lasts through the lifetime of the slave(s). In effect the chattel slave pays for his master’s new clothes. All chattel slavery functions to the benefit of both master and slave, but it does so on an unequal basis.

The same mechanism may operate for “medicine” and the like, bearing in mind that one man’s medicine is another’s poison. Chattel slavery, in this instance, may continence “free enterprise” by allowing chattel slaves to provide health care for themselves through minor surgery, healing herbs, and so on. However, if the medicine appears to be actually helpful, the master may well seize the source, declaring it a “controlled substance.” Thereafter, medicine will be dispensed to the ill slave according to his perceived future value. As with a lame horse, he may be given a “quick fix” and sold to another master. At other time the master may view “medicine withholding” as an economic way to void the previous relationship. Sound business principles are carefully weighed in these circumstances.

Although a plantation may represent a socialist state in microcosm, modern socialist states more closely resemble a corporate entity, which is owned by the workers. Workers may be advised that they are all equal and that they equally “own” the corporate state. However, invariably, the workers must set up a committee to make decisions in their behalf. These committees then appoint “specialists” to operate the “machinery of state” on a day-to-day basis. This process is known as the “Creation of the Pigs.” Inequality is born, a collective, mini-master rules the corporate state. At this point deceiving the workers is a necessary procedure in the rulers day-to-day operations.

A new political wisdom is born: It Is Foolish To Speak Truthfully To the workers. Indeed, the rulers invariably sponsor a media complex to distract the workers. Matters of fundamental importance to the workers are ignored; in their place are substituted trivial issues, which are accorded the gravest considerations.

In a similar fashion the children of the workers are educated to accept the “vision” of the Pigs. They are discouraged from considering what is good for the workers. False fears are used to guide workers from serious, practical matters, where resolution is possible, into areas that seem to have no solutions yet are colored in nightmarish tones.

The worker accepts the principle that he is paid from the fruit of his labor. He may sense a “robbing Peter to pay Paul” process has entered the equation, but guided by his leaders and the media, continues working for the “brighter tomorrow” which is just around the bend in the road.

In this socialist corporation there is typically a means of pooling the necessary money from which the salaries are paid. Parenthetically, a corporate state begins with a quantity of “money” on hand. This money may be increased or decreased by trade with other corporate states. It may be artifically increased by the leadership from time to time, according to sound principles based on increased productivity or on unsound bases, such as political expediency.

Usually, the leadership will “discover” taxation. Experts will be appointed to oversee the collection. It usually begins with the paycheck and spreads to individual products and services within the corporate state. In the old days of tax collection, the tax collectors had the opportunity to “clip” coins. Such opportunity engendered action. Since additional moneys were had by the sovereign in the initial tax-collection process, the clipped coins weren’t initially noticed. When they were noticed, the tax collectors could and would blame the taxpayers. They would be accused before the sovereign of trying to evade taxes.

That would likely seem to be a reasonable explanation to him. It also would tend to start to isolate the sovereign from his subjects. This framework is typically a feudal one, where mutual obligations are built into the corporate mechanism.

This also seems to apply in modern socialist states. Although the workers “own” the state, on a more practical basis the corporate state owns them. The day-to-day collective master of the socialist state is the leadership. Therefore, the feudal realationship in this situation is practically between the leadership and the workers. Since the workers get economically shafted by the leaders, it is important to keep them distracted by wars, sports, sex, and alcohol/drugs. In the latter instance, “wars” can be declared. The media and entertainment are helpful misdirectors of attention.

Educated to think that they are the “State,” workers are more prone to shoulder the burden of its “shortcomings,” even as their leaders are clearly not suffering under the burden themselves (except in speeches).

Since the pool of money is diverted increasingly from the workers to the leadership structure, the pool is expanded in utter disregard of sound principles based on productivity, so that workers will be paid at least what they received in the past. By necessity this policy creates inflation, usually followed by periods of “price-controls.” The buying power of the workers goes down, usually even if given a modest raise.

Here one notes that it is the leadership, rather than the tax farmers, per se, who “clip” the money gotten from the workers.

Parenthetically, Mr. Eustace Mullins in his NEW HISTORY OF THE JEWS (1968), p.123, stated: “Economists recently revealed that the white Christian middle class pays 84% of its income in taxes. Oh, no, says Mr. American, I only pay 46%, and I have an average job, an average home, and an average family. But, Mr. American, you haven’t figured the hidden taxes you pay on every consumer product which you and your family use. Add that to your 46% income tax, state, federal, and local, and you arrive at the figure 84%. By a startling coincidence, the eminent economist, J.J. Cavanagh, recently concluded a study for the National Zionist Foundation which showed that American Jews own 84% of the real wealth of the United States…”

In regard to Mr. Mullins’ discovery in regard to who pays the bulk of the taxes, one must admit that times have changed and income tax rates have varied, especially under President Ronald Reagan. Mr. Mullins didn’t specifically name the Social Security tax, which goes directly into the general revenue account, bonds being provided as collateral. However, I will say from comments heard on the radio by alleged experts, as well as seen in print from time to time, there are a lot of Americans who live from check to check. I’m one of them. Further, although the demographics in America have changed drastically since 1968, whatever people have now entered the American middle class, as replacements for the waning white population, have also assumed the same, or similar, tax burden.

As the population of workers increases, they threaten to dilute the individual “take,” unless productivity increases at least as much. Birth control seems a reaonable solution to a leadership witnessing their own “take” threatened by dilution. The leadership looks to science for “miracle” cures to the socialist state’s economic illness. Science responds with controlled viral epidemics. If the economic malady affects multiple socialist states, the community of leaders ponder “pandemics” as a way out of our “ills.” Another possible population control might be controlled famine. Claiming a disastrous crop failure, the “worried” leadership would them offer workers the stored, emergency rations of nutritionally-vacant foods.

If none of these ploys works and if the workers rise up in wrath, then the wisdom of the leadership manifests itself by the application of force from a well-fed military. Naturally, as the military force expands, barring an increase of productivity, the pool of money for the workers dilutes, as the leaders “clip” money through printing currency to cover the gap. The buying power of the workers is clipped.

By establishing two-tier merchandising, the stores for the leadership are kept well-stocked and constantly-priced, while scarcity and price-inflation characterize the stores built for the workers. The leaders dwell in the comfort of the mansion, while the workers are crammed into “slavetown complexes.”

The salary slavery system is an advance over the old chattel slavery one. In chattel slavery the slaves could at least point the finger of guilt at the master. In the modern corporate slavery system the worker-slaves are “conned” into “pointing the finger” at themselves.

Who are these “leaders,” anyway? Are they the people workers see? Or are they people the workers NEVER see?