HOW TO EXPLOIT THE MAJORITY

This is our second look at how decentralized deceit can have a result that tends toward being a centralized and self-serving, group ”project.” What could cause groups to do such a thing? Its purpose must be to advance the group relative to a majority. When a series of events that are not coordinated, nor even known to others perpetrating similar events, nevertheless occurs within a scattered membership of a self-conscious group, there is reason to suspect that within that group a private educational conditioning occurs that tends to a group “perception” of its destiny and of the perils to that destiny. If that group is consciously “different,” influential, and vociferous, it may decide that its best ploy is to pretend to be relentlessly hated, discriminated against, and “victimized” by violent, hateful members of the majority, or sometimes other minorities.

There also seems to be a real question whether America even has a “majority” anymore. There is a certain smug perception that “white people” are in the majority. For this reason minority groups are fond of ascribing something akin to “bullying” to this majotity, as well as insensitivity to the “needs” of one or more minority. Perenthetically, since white people have consistently shown weakness before the minorities which have dared to make demands, new minorities came or of the woodwork to declare themselves aggrieved, persecuted, and denied equal justice by the “majority” white people.

It has become a fairly lucrative game. In effect wealth and power are transferred from majority category to a batch of minorities. Yet, this transferral is itself improperly ascribed, as their are “minority groups” within the category, ”white people,” who are not much affected and, indeed, may benefit. For example, Jews may declared themselves to be white, or they may declare themselves to be nonwhite, as advantage & disadvantage are calculated. Freemasonry is composed mostly of “white people,” but they are the premier sponsors of all policies that “dovetail” with their watchwords: “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity,” as well as their newest watchword, ”Tolerance.” Furthermore, white people can be divided further into Roman Catholic, Protestant, and “Other.” These may often be on opposite sides of issues. Classism itself divides whites into minorities branches. And many “white people” aren’t really “white people” but are a mixed category, which wishes to be labeled “white” or is so labeled by the Census Bureau. In short, the idea of a “white majority” is an illusion. It is truer to discribe the “white people” as a cluster of often antagonistic groups. The most salient thing that they have in common is their group “victimhood” at the hands of other, nonwhite groups, which treat them as an undifferentiated group.

Amid all this confusion–a confusion which would hardly even exist in a homogeneous society, minorities seize the opporttunity to exploit the “majority.” Consider:

“A 23-year old Jewish medical student arrested in Basel, Switzerland was described by police as the perpetrator of a campaign of virulent anti-Semitic graffiti, harassment and death threats. Police disclosed that PHILIP GOTCHEL, son of a prominent family, was solely responsible for the acts, which were called unprecedented in Switzerland. Most of the anti-Semitic acts were directed against fellow Jewish students, their families and their non-Jewish friends.” [THE HOAXER PROJECT REPORT, 2nd printing (1991), Laird Wilcox, p.15]

What is striking about this is the level of education and social prominence involved found in the perpetrator. Jewish apologists may claim that he is “sick” and a “jew-hating Jew,” but he seems to be more like that Israeli doctor, Goldberg, as I recall, who slaughtered more than a score of muslims at a site on the Mount in Jerusalem. Incidentally, regardless of his name, that doctor is revered by groups in the Jewish state. But let’s continue with our look at aggrieved minorities in action.

“An Associated Press dispatch reported, ‘Vandals threw rocks through windows of eight Jewish-owned shops….Mayor EDWARD KOCH said the city would offer $10,000 reward…’ The Jewish Community Relations Council offered a $5000 reward as well. The windows were broken in the predominantly Orthodox Jewish areas of Boro Park and Flatbush in Brooklyn, NY. Around the nation newspapers reacted with shock and outrage and compared the incident to Kristallnacht, when Nazis terrorized Jews in pre-World War II Germany. Pressure from the Jewish Community brought increased police patrols and calls for greater vigilance against anti-Semitism. Within a month police had their man in custody. He was GARY DWORKIN, a 38 year-old Jewish resident of Boro Park. DWORKIN was charged with 14 counts, including felonies and misdemeanors. He was ordered to undergo psychiatric examination” [supra, p.14]

Well, apparently Jews were victimized by yet another “sick” Jew. In this episode–and it does seem like an ongoing series, one observes the media at once loudly jumping on the “Jewish victims’ bandwagon.” Once again, Jews throughout the world are given the opportunity to “play the ‘Holocaust’ card,” reminding the world’s nonJews of the peril to Jews and the need to provide them needed reassurances and protections, such as “Hate Crime” legislation. Then, elected officials of the Senators Kennedy and Biden sort leaped to frame such legislation in America, which so far have (thankfully) failed. But let’s hear another incident of Jewish fraud, shall we?

“Often, a false charge of anti-Semitism or racism is made because of values, opinions or beliefs expressed in a public forum. In the case of THOMAS SPEERS of Waterbury, CT, however, his expression of free speech landed him in court — and at the behest of the very host of the radio talk show he appeared on. SPEERS was arrested after radio talk show host JAY CLARK, who is Jewish, filed a complaint with police. Among the accusations made against SPEERS was that he was guilty of ‘Jew baiting’ because he frequently criticized Israel (sic). CLARK also testified that he frequently made personal attacks against SPEERS on the air. SPEERS contended that he was not anti-Semitic and that he was merely anti-Zionist and anti-Israel (sic). In ordering the acquittal of SPEERS Superior Court Judge ANTHONY V. DEMAYO, said, ‘What upsets me most about the state’s position is that the reason we are prosecuting this defendant is that his views differ so vehemently from those of the talk-show host.’ “ [suprs, p.21]

Besides that, what is upsetting to me is that the state got involved in this case to begin with. It is a clear indication of the Jewish communities ability to use federal and state prosecutors to initiate charges against people based essentially on the issue of “unlawful thoughts and words,” which is to say, ”thought crimes.” Why would attorneys for federal and state judicial offices consent to such prosecution? One reason is the hope of landing an enriching position as “partner” in a large, prominent law firm. There is an unspoken–or sotto voce, understanding that this prosecution will be interpreted as a “noble gesture” by a friend among the goyim. Such gestures can be professionally rewarding to a modestly paid govenment attorney. Many would leap at the opportunity. After all, they have to think of the “wife and kids,” don’t they?